However, three days later, when the construction team prepared the vertical steel frame and the vertical beam, it was found that the concrete that was solidified in three days was still loose, and the construction was forced to stop.
On April 4, after seeing that the ground beam concrete was still not solidified, the Zhicheng Experimental School suspected that it had bought “fake cement”. They contacted the dealer Zhang Jifang, and the other party failed to give a clear answer to the quality of the cement. On the afternoon of April 4th, the school sent the cement samples to Yimei Engineering Quality Testing Co. Ltd. of Huaiyang County, Henan Province. The samples showed that the cement flexural strength and compressive strength were not up to standard.
Zhang Guangqi said that in mid-April, “Haigu Zhonglian Brand” cement manufacturer Shandong Zaozhuang Pengyuan Building Material Co. Ltd. had sampled and returned to the factory to test that the cement was “qualified”.
On April 23, Zhicheng Experimental School complained to dealers and manufacturers to Luyi County Market Supervision Administration. After the acceptance of the bureau, the batch of cement was sampled and sent to the product quality inspection and inspection institute of Cangzhou City, Anhui Province.
The reporter saw from the inspection report issued by the Cangzhou City Product Quality Supervision and Inspection Institute in June that the cement sample showed an average of 0.8 (days) flexural strength (3 days), the national standard was 2.5 or more, and the compressive strength (3 days) average. The value is 3.4, the national standard is greater than or equal to 10.0; the average flexural strength (28 days) is 3.9, the national standard is greater than or equal to 5.5, the compressive strength (28 days) is 15.8, and the national standard is greater than or equal to 32.5. The sample failed.
“This means that the batch of cement is a substandard product.” The person in charge of the inspection work of the Luyi County Market Supervision Administration told the China Youth DailyChina Youth Network reporter that after receiving the complaint from the school, the bureau quickly conducted a sample test and relied on it. The test results are convened by the school, dealer, and factory for mediation.
The person in charge of the Luyi County Market Supervision Administration stated that the bureau will make relevant penalties in accordance with the product quality law. Currently, the procedure is being followed, but the dealer can only be punished. The manufacturer should investigate the relevant departments of Zaozhuang City, Shandong Province.deal with.
Zhang Guangqi said that after the annual income of the school is deducted from wages and operating expenses, the remaining funds are around 500,000 yuan. “There is more pressure on the school for one more day, and the loss of manufacturers is increasing.”
After the cement dispute occurred, the dormitory of the school was suspended for two months. It was just resumed in mid-June and the construction period has been delayed. To this end, the school temporarily moved some classrooms for temporary accommodation, so that children can "have a place to live" after school.
This article was independently produced by China Youth Daily, and was first launched in the China Youth Daily client and headline number to join the tree plan.xx